A bigger worry for these emerging platforms, though, is the network barrier. This can be summed up with Metcalfe's Law, explains Evan Prodromou, co-author and current editor of ActivityPub, another open social media architecture, which is behind popular platforms like Meta's Threads.
The law states that the value of a network goes up with the square of the number of users. That means that bigger social networks have way more resources than smaller ones. They can use those resources to get bigger and bigger and crowd out smaller social media services.
Non-profits like Free Our Feeds and the Social Web Foundation, which Mr Prodromou heads, have a strategy that they hope will help them overcome that Metcalfe's Law.
They hope to replace the current situation, where users of social media hop between their favourite services.
Instead Social Web Foundation is developing a platform which can offer content from all of them.
Threads for example supports a protocol called ActivityPub, which makes it easier to combine services with other social media firms that use that protocol - like Mastodon for instance.
Using this kind of interoperability, Mr Prodromou hopes that services like Social Web Foundation will provide the same value as giant, monolithic platforms.
It's not straightforward, as not all social media firms support the same protocol, for example, BlueSky uses the AT Protocol.
But there are workarounds to that problem, and Free Our Feeds and Social Web Foundation are also working on ways to aggregate sites that use different tech.
"One thing we've learnt from the past decades is that the last thing the world needs is a one-size-fits all solution for eight billion people," says Robin Berjon, one of Free Our Feeds' custodians.