Chancellor defends Waspi pensions decision after backlash

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has defended the decision to reject compensation for women hit by changes to the state pension age, arguing that the taxpayer "simply can't afford the tens of billions of pounds" in payments.

He added that "90% of those impacted knew about the changes that were taking place".

However, during Prime Minister's Questions, Sir Keir was repeatedly pressed on the government's decision, with one MP calling for a vote.

Campaigners say that 3.6 million women born in the 1950s were not properly informed of the rise in state pension age to bring them into line with men.

"We're certainly not giving up the fight," said Debbie de Spon, membership director of the Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) campaign.

The government's decision comes despite an independent government review recommending the compensation in March.

Rebecca Hilsenrath, head of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, which wrote the review, told Times Radio that although the government had accepted that it had delayed writing to 1950s-born women by 28 months, and apologised, it had rejected paying compensation.

"What we don't expect is for an acknowledgement to be made by a public body that it's got it wrong but then refuse to make it right for those affected," she said.

Diane Abbott is one of a small group of Labour MPs objecting to their leader's approach. Kate Osborne and Emma Lewell-Buck have also publicly opposed the decision.

The SNP is calling for a vote in Parliament on compensation. The party's Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said: "Labour Party politicians posed with Waspi women before the election only to leave them high and dry when they got into government."

Earlier, Conservative shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith also said the decision was "a betrayal", adding that Cabinet ministers had "queued up, had their photo taken with Waspi women, talked about how they were going to remedy that injustice."

He said "we won't know" whether a Conservative government would have paid compensation as they were voted out of government before making that decision.

The then Conservative-run Department of Work and Pensions told the ombudsman at the time of its report in March why it could not pay out.

It cited "the costs involved, the time it would take, the amount of resource it would involve, and the negative impact delivering a remedy would have on it being able to maintain other services".

About 3.6 million women were affected by a 1995 decision to increase the pension age to 65.

The plan was to phase in that change from 2010 to 2020.

But the coalition government of 2010 decided to speed that up.

Under the 2011 Pensions Act, the new qualifying age of 65 for women was brought forward to 2018, which affected 2.6 million women.

The Waspi campaign group has been pushing for compensation because it says the government failed to tell them - or provide adequate notice - about the changes.

It previously suggested some women should receive £10,000 each, at a cost of £36bn.

Nine months ago, the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman recommended compensation of between £1,000 and £2,950 for each of those affected, after a six year investigation.

Ms de Spon said: "It makes rather a mockery of that system if the [government] can cherry-pick which parts of that investigation they choose to accept."

The Liberal Democrats had earlier said the stance "sets an extremely worrying precedent" in its rejection of the ombudsman's findings.