Insiders I talk to are pretty sanguine about the prospect of this being seen by critics as a re-launch.
Perhaps a good job, given the Conservatives are saying precisely that, branding it an “emergency relaunch” and the Liberal Democrats have suggested the milestones were “on the road to nowhere” without what they see as a proper plan.
The relaunch critique carries some bite given the bumps the new government has endured.
But it is also true to say I have picked up chat about the planning for this moment for quite a while, where ministers would try to shift beyond their initial pitch billed as "fixing the foundations" and add to that by giving themselves a framework around which people can understand what they are prioritising.
They want to create a story about what they are trying to achieve so when the prime minister and his cabinet ministers are out and about they have stuff to point to about what they are focused on.
And, crucially, that means what they are paying less attention to as well - because you can’t prioritise some things without the trade off of deciding you are less fussed about other things.
What about immigration, both legal and illegal? Expect Sir Keir to argue that border security, national security and economic security are the basic must haves a government must deliver. But it doesn’t appear immigration will be one of the milestones, beyond a commitment to cut it.
Senior figures say they want to learn what they see as the lessons from the recent American presidential election - talking to voters in concrete, relatable terms and not in abstract international comparisons.
So while ministers remain committed to delivering the highest sustained growth in the G7 group of rich countries, for instance, the promise will instead focus on how well off, or not, you might feel as a family - whether you have more money to spend.
The arc of what we are seeing here can be traced back to February 2023, when Sir Keir first set out his so-called "missions" for government.
They provided the backbone for the general election manifesto, but while their advocates insisted they provided a detailed blueprint for government, critics fretted they lacked detail - snappy, understandable, even memorable promises, that were measurable.