The Dutch government said it originally invoked the Act following concerns "from actions attributed to the now-suspended CEO, involving the improper transfer of product assets, funds, technology, and knowledge to a foreign entity".
"These actions ran counter to the interests of the company, its shareholders, and Dutch and European strategic autonomy and security of supply," it said.
In October, a Dutch court ordered the removal of ex-Nexperia CEO and Wingtech founder Zhang Xuezheng, citing alleged mismanagement.
The Dutch government added that its decision had aimed to prevent a situation in which chips could become unavailable in an emergency.
In December last year, the US government placed Wingtech, which owns Nexperia, on its so-called "entity list", identifying the company as a national security concern.
Under the regulations, US companies are barred from exporting American-made goods to businesses on the list unless they have special approval.
In the UK, Nexperia was forced to sell its silicon chip plant in Newport after MPs and ministers expressed national security concerns. It currently owns a UK facility in Stockport.
Following the Dutch government's reversal, the Beijing acknowledged the move but said it was "still a step away from addressing the root cause of the global semiconductor supply chain turmoil and chaos".
"Furthermore, the erroneous ruling by the corporate court, spearheaded by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, to strip Wingtech of its control over Nexperia remains a key obstacle to resolving the issue," it added.
Wingtech has said it will fight the decision.
Following the latest move, a spokesperson for Wingtch said the company "strongly" rejected the allegations against its chief executive.
"To date, no proof has been provided," it added. "If the Dutch government is sincere about solving the problem, the Ministry should now file a letter with the Enterprise Chamber, explicitly withdrawing its support for the proceedings.
"These proceedings form a threat to the continuity of Nexperia B.V. and therefore for the economic security of the Netherlands and Europe - which is the exact same argument the Dutch government made previously in support of judicial intervention."